Digital clock

Wednesday, April 6, 2011

WHEN ACCEPTED BY CANADA,
BECOME CANADIAN 06-APRIL-2011

©Susan Elizabeth Dykhuis AKA ©Sasha Gold ©Sasha Canadian

This is frightening, http://www.youtube.com/embed/A3YQANdvvbY
To watch, Cut and Paste link into your browser OR highlight link and click.


Wasn’t the battle of the Muslim goal "Islam will rule The World" already fought and decided, i.e., The Spanish-Moor Wars AKA The Spanish and Portuguese Reconquest, 1095–1492? Why do we in Western Nations of Judaic-Christian values and Western Societal Values continue to permit immigrants from Muslim countries who refuse to integrate by accepting our values?

Equally frightening: http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DB_kyNIevsIs&h=2a06c
To watch this, Cut and Paste link into your browser OR highlight link and click

My view is and always will be:

When one is welcomed as an immigrant to Western Nations which are Judaic-Christian in values, then one must integrate with that society. Should one from a Western Nation immigrate to Islamic Nations, one is compelled to integrate into that society.

I think the global family of humans must insist that Human Rights prevail at all times: equality rights, civic rights, education rights, employment rights, and ethical/spiritual, religious and secular. When religious rights interfere with Human Rights, Human Rights must prevail.

I am not interested in immigrants, Muslim or otherwise, who come to Canada and then do not accept and adapt to our Western values which hold the right of the person sacred with Human Rights entrenched above all other rights.

Seeing what is happening in Canada and other Western countries vis-a-vis "Islamic" Muslims, I wonder why we, in Western countries, tolerate it. Toleration = “Islam will rule The World" = becoming fact, perhaps in our lifetimes.

How about United Nations? Read this: http://www.nationalreview.com/media-blog/28926/no-joke-u-n-appoints-iran-womens-rights-commission/tom-gross

I think UN is a farce.

My view is:
1) Immigrant(s) to Canada must adapt within the 3-year period which is the time required to request citizenship.
2) Adapt means accepting The Canadian Charter of Rights, learning Western culture, learning Canada’s official languages, English and French, educating their children to the ideas and ideals of Canada.
3) If immigrant(s) won't accept this condition of citizenship, then Canada must revoke landed immigrant rights and the person(s) must leave Canada immediately.
4)If one is granted Canadian citizenship and does not integrate within 5 years after citizenship is granted, then Canada must revoke citizenship and the person(s) must leave the country immediately. Children born in Canada to immigrants who refuse to integrate are not Canadians by birth. Only children born to immigrants who comply with the laws of Canada are granted citizenship.


I want Canadian and Western, i.e.: Judaic-Christian values to remain the values of my country, Canada. I want Western Nations to, as Ann Landers would advise: “Wake up and smell the coffee!”

Here's me, wondering how much of the acts depicted in the YouTube videos will The Canadian, American, Australian, British, Dutch, French, German, Israeli, Spanish, Et Al citizens and Governments of Western countries accept? I know my limit of tolerance. What is yours?

















WHEN ACCEPTED BY CANADA,
BECOME CANADIAN 06-APRIL-2011

©Susan Elizabeth Dykhuis AKA ©Sasha Gold ©Sasha Canadian

Sunday, April 3, 2011

Honour Killing -- cultural, religious or predator tactic?
(c)*Susan Elizabeth Dykhuis, 03April2011
(c)*AKA Sasha Gold, Sasha Canadian


Article here:
http://www.averroespress.com/AverroesPress/Honour-Killings.html

I read this many times. What I gleaned from reading and re-reading is:

Honour Killing is a male-contrived act, not necessarily cultural or religious, but a tactic or action used by males to control females. Origin is perhaps an innate urge to pass down one's DNA.

This reaffirms my long-held personal view that in an extreme situation, any male is capable of raping, enslaving or killing a woman or women if he thinks other males will not punish or kill him for his acts. If he could also kill other males' offspring without retribution to him or his offspring, most likely that could happen too.


Mother Nature's live birth ratio male : female is 105 : 100 Was this Mother Nature's way to ensure males would vie for the female, thus ensuring stronger/healthier males father the next generation? Is it perhaps an innate male factor to fight to pass down his genes the cause or part of why males try to control females?

Mother Nature overlooked factoring in medical advancements where pre-determination of gender before live birth resulted in many female fetuses aborted. Societies with a preference for male fetuses over female ones now face a situation where there are not enough women to marry surplus of males born because of this anti-female bias.

To eradicate Honour Killing would require concerted effort by the male half of the population. If the majority of men globally had a policy of eliminating males who commit "honour killings", in time that would eradicate this "custom".

In the name of your daughters, I ask men everywhere, what has taken the male half of the human population so long to avenge the honour killers?


Honour Killing -- cultural, religious or predator tactic?
(c)*Susan Elizabeth Dykhuis, 03April2011
(c)*AKA Sasha Gold, Sasha Canadian

Article here:
http://www.averroespress.com/AverroesPress/Honour-Killings.html

FADIME SAHINDAL R.I.P.